
Low-carb
diets get some vindication Two new studies show
faster weight loss over the short term
Obesity rates are rising, but science has barely weighed
in on the best way for people to shed fat. That state
of affairs is starting to change, and doctors are getting
a surprise or two.
Last month, the popular carb-slashing Atkins diet received
a dollop of endorsement from two studies after years
of being pooh-poohed by health specialists. The
studies, published in the journal Annals of Internal
Medicine, showed that the meat- and fat-rich regimen
caused faster weight loss in the short term than a conventional
low-fat diet.
More important - because many had feared that the diet,
even if slimming, might unfavorably affect cholesterol
levels and be bad for the heart - the
low-carb regimen also seemed to improve the dieters'
blood fat profiles.
But Atkins, like every other diet, is no miraculous
fat-melter. The longer of the two studies suggested
that a low-carb regimen might be harder to maintain
beyond six months compared with a low-fat approach:
By the end of the year, the low-fat dieters had caught
up and lost the same - very modest - amount of heft.
In addition, even though on average people on low-carb
diets didn't experience rises in their so-called "bad"
(or LDL) cholesterol levels, about 30 percent of individuals
did.
Even with these caveats, "We can no longer dismiss
very-low-carbohydrate diets," said Dr. Walter Willett,
a nutritional epidemiologist at the Harvard School of
Public Health, in a written editorial accompanying the
papers. To maximize the diets' healthfulness, he added,
people should avoid going hog-wild on fatty bacon and
red meat - opting instead to eat healthy oils (monounsaturated
and polyunsaturated fats) and get protein
from fish, beans, nuts and chicken.
The weight-loss regimen popularized by the late Dr.
Robert Atkins - rich in meat, eggs and cheese but almost
bereft of grains, potatoes and fruit - is highly popular
but had not been tested in a scientifically rigorous
way until last year, when two studies reported that
very obese and moderately obese people lost more weight
initially on the Atkins diet than on a conventional
diet.
The studies published last month bolster and extend
these findings.
Conducted at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, the first study enrolled 132 severely obese
adults who had an average weight of 288 pounds. Many
of the patients in the study had diabetes or other risk
factors for coronary artery disease.
Roughly half of them were instructed to pursue a low-fat
diet in which they were to eat 500 fewer calories a
day. The others followed a regimen in which they were
to limit their carbohydrate intake to less than 30 grams
daily but were not instructed to count calories or fat.
Both groups were counseled on the diets each week.
The scientists reported last year that at six months,
the low-carbohydrate group had lost an average of about
13 pounds, compared with 4 pounds for the low-fat group.
Last month, the scientists reported that after one year,
individuals on the Atkins-style diet largely kept the
weight off but did not continue to lose more weight.
The low-fat group continued to lose weight slowly over
the course of the year.
Total weight loss for both groups over the year was
slight: an average of 11 to 19 pounds for the low-carb
group and seven to 19 pounds for the low-fat group.
In addition, the study found that diabetic patients
improved control over their blood sugar levels using
the low-carb approach.
The second investigation was funded by the Robert C.
Atkins Foundation, although the foundation did not take
part in the study or its analysis. Conducted at Duke
University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., it enrolled
120 moderately obese adults who had high blood cholesterol
levels.
At six months, participants who followed a low-carb
approach had lost an average of 26 pounds, compared
with 14 pounds for the low-fat group.
Weight loss wasn't the only effect of these diets. Both
studies found that levels of triglycerides - blood fats
that are risk factors for heart disease - fell further
in the low-carb group than in the low-fat group. Levels
of HDL, or "good" cholesterol, also appeared
to improve more in the low-carb group.
Still, experts said more studies were needed to ensure
that the HDL lipid change was favorable and that the
higher amounts of fat consumed on an Atkins-style diet
would not increase a dieter's risk for heart disease.
The American Heart Association issued a statement expressing
concern about the safety of the diet, given its richness
in saturated fats - and noting that at one year, in
any case, the results for the diets were a wash.
To be safe, people on an Atkins-style diet should have
their blood lipids monitored regularly in case their
"bad" cholesterol goes up, said Dr. William
Yancy, assistant professor of medicine at Duke and lead
author of the study there.
If a low-carb diet sheds more fat in the short term
- why does it? Atkins always held that the secret of
his diet was ketosis, a body state in which fat would
be burned more efficiently. But the key may be rather
less magical, said Dr. Frederick Samaha, chief of cardiology
at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center
and co-author of the Philadelphia study.
Low-carbohydrate diets are richer in protein and fat,
which have the effect of making a person feel full more
rapidly. That means they'll eat fewer calories.
Not only that, but people following an Atkins-style
diet have many more food restrictions, which could also
slash the number of calories they consume.
These very restrictions could make it harder to stay
with the diet over the longer haul - and might easily
be the reason why patients on low-carb diets eventually
stopped losing weight, while low-fat dieters continued
to lose, Samaha said.
"I think it's partly the monotony - but also, the
low-carb diet really forces people to prepare their
own foods - to go out and buy fish and chicken and meat,"
he said. "Whereas for low-fat diets there's a lot
of really good, readily available food to grab off the
shelf."